CHICAGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–A new class-action lawsuit has unveiled an eight-year-long antitrust, price-fixing scheme brought by major food conglomerates, including Tyson and Perdue Farms, alleging they killed hens, flocks and destroyed eggs to limit production and raise the price of 98 percent of the chicken sold in the U.S. by nearly 50 percent, according to Hagens Berman.

The suit calls the industry’s means of destroying its livestock “unparalleled.”

The lawsuit, filed Sept. 14, 2016, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division states that the laundry list of defendants control 90 percent of the wholesale broiler chicken market – an industry with more than $30 billion in annual revenue.

If you purchased chicken from any of the following suppliers, you may be entitled to your money back: Tyson, Perdue Farms, Pilgrim’s Pride,
Sanderson Farms, Simmons Foods, Koch Meats, JCG Foods, Koch Meats, Wayne Farms, Mountaire Farms, Peco Foods, Foster Farms, House of Raeford Farms, Fieldale Farms, George’s Farms or O.K. Foods. Find out your rights to compensation.

“For years, these major food corporations sought to take full control of the market to squeeze every penny they could from hard working
consumers, and they broke federal laws and killed thousands of chickens to do so,” said Steve Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman.
“Instead of honest competition, these agribusinesses chose to cheat the system, killing off flocks and destroying eggs to limit the amount of
production and pass the buck to millions of Americans.”

“Call to Arms” to Limit Production

The lawsuit describes in detail how the chicken industry conspired together to raise prices, stating that in 2007, Pilgrim’s and Tyson
attempted to cut production levels enough to cause industry prices to rise, but failed to impact the market due to their market share.

“In January 2008 Pilgrim’s and Tyson changed tactics and concluded that only through broader cooperation among major producers in the Broiler
industry could supply be cut enough to force prices to increase,” the suit states.

Pilgrim’s and Tyson publicly told the industry that neither company would continue to cut production while their competitors used the
opportunity to take away Pilgrim’s and Tyson’s market share. But a few days after an industry event in late January 2008, things changed. The
suit says that “other Defendant Producers followed Pilgrim’s and Tyson’s call to arms and made substantial cuts to their own production.”

“One by one, there was a domino effect,” Berman said. “They all fell in line, colluding to nix competition and raise prices by actively
destroying their means of production – the animals – all the while making profit hand over fist.”

After attending the industry event, Tyson’s CEO announced Tyson would be raising prices because “we have no choice.” A day later, a Pilgrim’s
executive announced publicly that Pilgrim’s would be cutting its production and “the rest of the market is going to have to pick-up a
fair share in order for the production to come out of the system.”

According to the suit, unlike Pilgrim’s and Tyson’s prior production cuts, in 2008 the defendant chicken producers did not rely solely on
ordinary mechanisms to temporarily reduce production, which would have permitted production to be quickly ramped up if prices rose.

“Instead, Defendant Producers cut their ability to ramp up production for 18 months or more by destroying Broiler breeder hens in their
Broiler breeder flocks responsible for supplying the eggs Defendant Producers raise into Broilers. This destruction of the Broiler breeder
flock was unparalleled,” the lawsuit states.

The industry kingpins continued to make coordinated cuts to their production in 2011 and 2012, which included further substantial
destruction of industry breeder flocks, even going as far as to ship breeder flocks to Mexico.

Find out more about the chicken price-fixing lawsuit.

For more information visit the source link below.