Menu
  • Partners
  • Login
  • RSS

Class Action Review

Stay informed • A Claim Is Just The Beginning

  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Lawsuits
  • Class-Actions
  • Legal News
  • Settlements
  • News
  • Notices
Hot Topics
  • Sep 26, 2019 | Lawsuit Over Bible in Veterans Hospital Can Move Forward, Judge Says
  • Sep 26, 2019 | W.Va. Governor’s Companies Ordered to Pay $35M in Lawsuit
  • Sep 26, 2019 | How to Claim Your $100 Settlement if Yahoo Leaked Your Data
  • Sep 26, 2019 | Factbox: U.S. Lawsuits Take Aim at Vaping
  • Sep 26, 2019 | StarKist Reimburses Customers After Offering Tuna as Settlement
Home Legal News

Judge Rules Against Female Inmates in Lawsuit

TOPICS:AccountAttemptButtonClickCurrentlyFeelFormerInformationPleaseSubscription

Posted By: CAReview Editor Aug 8, 2016

by Nolan Clay

A federal judge has ruled the former warden and deputy warden of the women’s prison in McLoud are not to blame for sex crimes there.

Eleven inmates who were victimized by guards at Mabel Bassett Correctional Center sued the Oklahoma Corrections Department, former Warden Millicent Newton-Embry, former Deputy Warden Carla King and others in 2013.

The lawsuit was filed in Oklahoma City federal court. It alleged the wardens created “a corruptive den for sexual depravity where the guards were authorized to prey upon and commit acts of excessive force against the inmates whenever and wherever they chose without meaningful consequence.”

One fired guard, Jamie Baker, pleaded guilty in 2014 to rape and other sexual offenses involving eight of the inmates. He is serving a 20-year prison sentence.

U.S. District Judge Joe Heaton dismissed the claims against the Corrections Department in 2014. In June, the judge ruled in favor of the former warden and deputy warden and against the nine women still suing.

“What happened to plaintiffs should not have occurred, regardless of whether the particular sexual incidents are determined to be consensual or not,” the judge wrote in June.

“Plaintiffs’ desire for someone to pay for what Baker did to them — beyond Baker’s incarceration — is understandable. But under the circumstances reflected by the parties’ submissions here, the law does not impose liability on the otherwise innocent supervisors of the facility where the plaintiffs’ rights were violated.”

Will plaintiffs appeal?

The judge specifically rejected claims Newton-Embry could be held liable for the sex crimes because of inadequate staffing at the prison. Even though she was suspended without pay over staffing issues in 2012, “it is … undisputed that Newton-Embry was trying to address the problem,” the judge noted.

Whether the plaintiffs appeal is up in the air. Their lead attorney, Brad Mallet, is giving up private practice to be general counsel of the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma. His last day at his current firm is Friday.

The inmates sued Baker, too, but it is unclear if he ever got notice of the civil lawsuit.

Newton-Embry now serves as the Corrections Department’s coordinator for the Prison Rape Elimination Act, a federal law enacted in 2003 to cut down on sexual assaults in the nation’s
prisons.

Source: www.tulsaworld.com www.tulsaworld.com

SHARE
TWEET
PIN
SHARE
  • Older article
  • Newer article

Related Articles

Lawsuits

Aaron Hernandez’s Lawyers’ New Lawsuit Points Blame at Helmet Maker Riddell


Lawsuits

Facebook Can’t Shake Lawsuit Over Data Breach


Securities

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Announces Class Action Filed Against MiMedx Group, Inc. (MDXG)


Lawsuits

Former Fannie Mae CEO Settles Crisis-Related Lawsuit With SEC


Latest Headlines

Sep 26, 2019

Lawsuit Over Bible in Veterans Hospital Can Move Forward, Judge Says


Sep 26, 2019

W.Va. Governor’s Companies Ordered to Pay $35M in Lawsuit


Sep 26, 2019

How to Claim Your $100 Settlement if Yahoo Leaked Your Data


No Picture

Sep 26, 2019

Factbox: U.S. Lawsuits Take Aim at Vaping


Sep 26, 2019

StarKist Reimburses Customers After Offering Tuna as Settlement


Featured Articles

Nov 9, 2016

Volkswagen’s Audi Facing Fresh Emissions Cheating Lawsuit

Embattled Volkswagen is facing a new lawsuit in US courts over devices used to cheat emissions standards, this one against luxury brand Audi, according to court documents. The new case filed Tuesday in Illinois court, cites a media report Audi installed the cheating devices on gasoline-powered cars to hide the true emissions of climate-warming gas carbon dioxide, court papers say. The latest suit follows last month’s USD 14.7 billion class action settlement in Volkswagen’s diesel emissions cheating scandal, which has rocked …

Read More

Apr 22, 2016

Wisconsin Supreme Court Accepts Case Challenging Medical Records Fees


Sep 23, 2016

Colorado Springs Law Firm Plans Second Widefield Water Lawsuit


Sep 9, 2016

Alabama’s Appellate Courts System Rigged to Block Minority Judges


Feb 8, 2017

IMPORTANT INVESTOR ALERT: Lundin Law PC Announces Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against FXCM Inc. And Encourages Investors With Losses to Contact the Firm


Categories
  • Class-Actions
  • Lawsuits
  • Legal News
  • News
  • Notices
  • Opinion
  • Securities
  • SECURITY
  • Settlements
  • SKIP
  • Uncategorized
Recent Articles
  • Lawsuit Over Bible in Veterans Hospital Can Move Forward, Judge Says
  • W.Va. Governor’s Companies Ordered to Pay $35M in Lawsuit
  • How to Claim Your $100 Settlement if Yahoo Leaked Your Data
  • Factbox: U.S. Lawsuits Take Aim at Vaping
  • StarKist Reimburses Customers After Offering Tuna as Settlement
  • RSS
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Contact Us
  • Login

Copyright 2016-2019 | ClassActionReview.com